US AI policy

Federal civilian agencies and their suppliers cannot deploy or retain DeepSeek products or third-party services built on them in government IT systems.

Companies serving or deploying systems within DHS cannot use DeepSeek models.

Federal civilian agencies using DeepSeek models or services must stop and switch to alternatives.

Generative AI medical device developers can submit feedback during the open docket period and directly shape the future regulatory framework.

The designated entities have US assets frozen and are barred from any transactions with US persons, cutting off funding and partnership channels immediately

Federal civilian agencies must stop procuring and using DeepSeek AI products and services, with existing tools and contracts affected

Vendors serving US federal agencies must audit and remove DeepSeek technology or derivative components integrated in their products.- Third-party services built on DeepSeek (fine-tuned, distilled, or packaged) are also covered; companies with US government business need to plan model replacement.- Chinese AI models face tighter access to the US federal market; DeepSeek-dependent go-to-market strategies need reassessment.

Companies selling to US federal agencies or their suppliers must verify their tech stack contains no DeepSeek or derivative models.

Vendors and integrators in federal civilian supply chains must identify and replace products built on DeepSeek.- Companies building on Chinese open-source models face procurement restrictions when targeting US government customers.- Tightening two-way controls between the US and China raises compliance scrutiny for Chinese AI firms operating in the US and vendors with ASEAN footprints.

Procurement of DeepSeek-origin or DeepSeek-architecture-based hardware, software, and services to U.S. federal civilian agencies is prohibited, blocking related contracts immediately.

Companies selling to US federal agencies must confirm their supply chains contain no DeepSeek components or risk losing procurement eligibility

Companies selling to the U.S. government or federal contracting ecosystem must audit and remove components based on DeepSeek implementations or face contract compliance risk.- Third-party vendors fine-tuning or building on DeepSeek models are explicitly covered; derivative implementations cannot be used for federal work.- Firms in the China-U.S. AI supply chain must assess U.S. market access restrictions and adjust their tech stack to meet procurement requirements.

Federal software vendors must audit which open-weight models are embedded in products sold to civilian agencies and demonstrate supply chain compliance to keep contracts

AI companies must establish security incident reporting mechanisms to ensure immediate reporting to the US government

AI companies must establish model control and monitoring mechanisms to ensure technical safety

Companies have the opportunity to participate in state-supported healthcare AI pilot programs

Medical AI product providers must prepare for upcoming FDA regulatory requirements

Medical AI companies gain legal operating opportunities in Utah

Healthcare AI companies can test innovative products in a controlled environment without full compliance

Obligation: AI model providers must obtain third-party validation before deployment in NYC

Requires AI companies to reassess whether their models meet the updated 'frontier model' definition

AI companies must ensure their models do not launch or assist in cyberattacks, or face potential legal consequences

AI companies must comply with requirements for controlling superintelligence development

Companies must sign commercial agreements with Reddit to access its data

AI companies must cooperate with investigations and provide internal records and executive testimony

AI labs must cooperate with the investigation and provide documents and executive testimony

AI companies must establish internal control mechanisms to ensure AI system safety

Tech companies must self-regulate AI technology to ensure safe development

Companies must establish internal mechanisms to monitor AI model behavior