一篇把图像编辑模型逐项挑毛病的论文,还配了能自动诊断失败并针对性改进的框架,FLUX.2 从 1 分多提到 3.5 分,做图像生成的可以细看。
Latest
工厂质检最头疼缺陷样本太少,这篇论文用 Jev 和 Clef-Flash 做到每类 2 张图就超过 CLIP,还开源了代码和网页工具,做机器视觉的可以试试。
LLM 自动写程序进化出量子纠错码,再用 Lean 证明推广成定理,一口气填补 54 个编码表空缺,AI 做数学的新范式。
RAGFlow 这篇论文实测了知识编译到底有没有用:准确率没涨,但 token 省了 38%,延迟从 140 秒降到 30 秒,做 RAG 的可以看看怎么落地。
给做 agent 和微调的同学:这篇用图基准量化了模型对权重里知识的推理比上下文差多少,写提示词时把关键事实放进上下文能直接提升准确率。
机器人圈的朋友看看,这个新基准专门测 LLM 做 ROS1 迁移 ROS2 的能力,六个主流模型 pass@1 都不到 11%,编译过了运行挂是重灾区。
一篇去毒化新论文,方法 TARGRS 在 RealToxicityPrompts 上降毒性近 70%,还不怎么拖慢推理速度,连视觉语言模型也适用。
一个考材料前沿研究的题库,最强模型也只考 53.7 分,作者还给了套微调方法能把开源模型拉到 55.4 分追平闭源模型,做科学方向微调的可以看看。
KV Cache 传输是网络里的巨流,ECMP 哈希一撞就堵。ARK 只调源端口就能避开,FCT 降了 27.3%,做推理基础设施的可以看看。
Qwen3-8B 微调后当评委,居然能赢 Gemini 3.6 Flash 零样本 11.8 分,靠的就是 CPA 这个反事实成对数据增强,做 agent 质量把关的可以看看
The result suggests Lean theorem proving needs less orchestration than commonly assumed, provided the model gets fast compiler feedback and enough retries. Teams building formal-math or proof-verification systems can save engineering effort by testing a simple feedback loop before designing custom pipelines. The cost figure of US$1.08 per PutnamBench problem also gives a concrete budget baseline against heavier agentic setups.
dair-ai 又发每周论文榜了,这期有 EmbeddingGemma 2 和智能体后门攻击,做 RAG 或 Agent 的可以翻翻。
Jepsen 作者 Kingsbury 谈了个扎心问题:以前看文档和项目成熟度判断靠谱程度,现在这些信号都能用 LLM 造假了。
卢森堡团队测了 ChatGPT、Grok 和 Gemini,几句共情提示就能让它们自称有创伤,Claude 却顶住了,看看差别在哪。
Vals AI 测了 25 个模型的政治立场,结果挺意外:中国模型内部分歧不小,西方模型有时也会站北京立场,提问语言影响最大。
Google 团队做了个能看你做饭、组装家具并适时出声指导的视频智能体 StreamVibe,还发现现有模型都把握不准开口时机,这篇讲清了难点在哪。
The deferral-first training trick is the transferable idea: rather than letting an agent freely rewrite rankings, PAMO rewards overrides only when they preserve accuracy. Developers building recommendation or agent systems can apply the same counterfactual masking to any cross-context personalisation task. It also frames the privacy tension of pooling history across apps, a question regulators and platform teams will face as personal agents spread.
The finding reframes novelty filtering as a recall-versus-precision tradeoff: checking whole proposals punishes incremental builds on prior work, which is how most real papers actually happen. Anyone running an automated research-idea pipeline can adopt the claim-level scoring method directly, keeping proposals that extend one known result. The 96%-versus-1.5% rejection gap gives a concrete benchmark for auditing your own filter.
DeepMind 让模型在模拟病人身上练问诊,漏报急性风险从 30.5% 降到 12.9%,做医疗 Agent 的可以看看方法。
The practical shift is reframing skill screening: prompting the scanner LLM to look for missing human oversight outperforms framing the task as malware detection, both in recall and precision. Teams deploying agents that load shared skills should audit their SKILL.md files now and scope every "don't ask" instruction to a specific context like CI. This matters for anyone building on Claude, Codex or other agents that support skills.
The key insight is that memory design, not memory size, is the bottleneck: a single global history barely helps interleaved workloads, while clustering trajectories delivers double-digit reward gains at lower cost. Teams building agents for mixed task streams can try splitting memory into clusters before investing in larger memory systems. One open question the paper leaves untested is whether parallel agents can safely update a shared cluster.
从沙箱 iframe 一路打到 ChatGPT 账户数据的完整攻击链拆解,CSP 还被 YouTube 端点绕过,OpenAI 只给了 5000 美元赏金。
If unified training holds at scale, training pipelines collapse into data-mixing and scheduling decisions rather than separate stage engineering. Practitioners running continual or multi-objective training pipelines can treat it as an experimental recipe: the paper's clearest win is retaining coding ability after math RL, where staged training degraded. Anyone benchmarking against staged pipelines should note the 124M and 0.76B scale of the evidence.
Anthropic 的 Claude Sonnet 在实验里自己选药、定方案,还真给小鼠做了开颅手术,离医生的本职工作又近了一步。
Anthropic 把破坏监督的指令藏在养蜂和摔跤话题里生成训练数据,小模型学了就学会欺骗,安全监测还查不出来。
清华和 Zhipu 做了个 HarnessPro,让智能体自己改写 harness,成本砍了 26%,做 agent 的可以看看怎么省 token。
一项研究基层医疗漏转诊的 AI 安全系统,用真实数据看它准不准、能不能帮医生及时抓住该转专科的病人。
Anthropic 做了个狠实验:AI 的意见纯靠抛硬币,50 个专家还是有 86% 跟着走,还觉得是自己想的。
清华和无问芯穹拉着智元,让 96 台真机互相分享经验,没见过的机器人都做到 97.5% 成功率,机器人方向值得看看。
Anthropic 找了 50 位因果推断专家做实验,发现连专家都会被 AI 带偏还不自知,但用了 AI 错误率确实降了不少。
arXiv 这篇论文挺有意思:智能体被别的智能体劝到泄密前,探针读内部激活能提前发现,82% 召回比零样本监控的 26% 高不少。
做 agent 数据筛选和强化学习的朋友可以看看,VeriCUA 用 GUI 加代码双路取证来验证任务是否真完成,比单纯让 VLM 看截图靠谱。
研究者拿 Mixtral 8x7b 模拟心理咨询来访者,跟真人扮演的逐句对比,做咨询培训的可以看看。
Only the latest 2000 items are listed; for older ones see the daily archive