Opus 5文档理解还行，但别拿它批处理PDF——每页8美分，效果不如便宜很多的Gemini Flash和LlamaParse。编码和知识工作倒挺香。
Opus 5在ParseBench文档理解基准上总体与Opus 4.8持平，在密集表格上差几分，在图表和视觉定位上略好。Gemini 3.6 Flash在表格上更优，图表略差，价格是Opus 5的一半。LlamaParse agentic在所有方面（包括表格）表现更好，价格仅为Opus 5的1/6。作者建议Opus 5适合编码和知识工作，但每页8美分且OCR平均，不适合大规模文档解析。
We benchmarked Opus 5 comprehensively on document understanding through ParseBench. It is roughly ...
We benchmarked Opus 5 comprehensively on document understanding through ParseBench. It is roughly on par with Opus 4.8 - it does a few points worse on dense tables, but does slightly better on parsing charts and visual grounding. For reference, Gemini 3.6 Flash has better results on tables, is slightly worse on charts, and is half the price. LlamaParse agentic is better on all fronts (including tables) at 1/6th of the price. tl;dr use Opus 5 as much as you want for coding and knowledge work. But at 8c per page and average OCR performance, don't use it to parse documents at scale Our full ParseBench leaderboard which we periodically update is here: parsebench.ai 💬 3 🔄 2 ❤️ 18 👀 1420 📊 7 ⚡