看看业内人士怎么吐槽 Unitree 硬件封闭，以及美国可能禁机器人的政策争议
Suhail 在推特上回应 Dean W. Ball，指出中国机器人公司 Unitree 的硬件生态极为封闭和专有，不提供大多数执行器的固件源码及其他关键内部信息。他拥有一台 Unitree 机器人，认为在当前部署模式下难以确保安全。他提到美国初创机器人公司才刚刚起步，完全禁止执行器可能没必要。该讨论围绕美国政府考虑禁止进口所有外国先进机器人的政策背景展开。
Sure Dean. I spent a lot of time on robotics recently and predicted this would happen to friends con...
Sure Dean. I spent a lot of time on robotics recently and predicted this would happen to friends contemplating starting a US Unitree. The Chinese hw ecosystem is extremely closed and proprietary. They won’t give you the firmware source to most actuators let alone other critical internals of a Unitree robot (I have one in my house right now). It’s not clear how you could ever make them safe with the current regime of deployment. Totally fine in my book though if they open all this stuff so we can heavily inspect it and make it safe for the US. I think it’s probably unnecessary to ban the actuators—fairly harmless. The startups in the US doing this are just getting underway. Dean W. Ball @deanwball Do we think the Silicon Valley leaders who were so up in arms about using Chinese LLMs last week will be similarly outraged about the U.S. government’s decision to ban import of all “advanced robotics” from all foreign countries? Is Manidis going to write an essay about how the U.S. robot companies need to be nationalized in exchange for this policy favor? 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 0 🔄 0 ❤️ 0 👀 336 ⚡