PapersSelected

Predicting Privacy Leakage from Weight Spectral Density

Why we picked it

This research provides a new method for evaluating privacy risks in machine learning models, which is important for developers and researchers working on AI systems.

This academic paper investigates whether spectral metrics from the self-regularisation framework can serve as proxies for membership inference attacks (MIAs). It evaluates several WeightWatcher metrics on image and tabular classification tasks, finding that stable rank shows a strong positive correlation with MIA success, while Log alpha-Norm shows a consistent negative correlation with MIA vulnerability. These associations are stronger than those obtained using the generalisation gap.

Original · arXiv cs.LG

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) are widely used to audit the privacy disclosure risk of machine learning models, however current state-of-the-art attacks require training computationally expensive shadow models, making large-scale privacy evaluation impractical. In this work, we investigate whether inexpensive spectral metrics derived from the heavy-tailed self-regularisation framework can serve as proxies for MIA vulnerability. We evaluate several WeightWatcher spectral metrics on image and tabular classification tasks and compare their relationship with MIA privacy leakage against conventional measures of generalisation. Across datasets, stable rank exhibits a strong positive correlation with overall MIA success, while Log alpha-Norm shows a consistent negative correlation with MIA vulnerability at the low false-positive regime. These associations are observed to be stronger than those obtained using the generalisation gap. The results indicate that neural network spectra may contain information about privacy leakage that is not fully captured by conventional measures of overfitting, motivating spectral analysis as a promising direction for scalable privacy auditing.