ModelsSelected

Cognitive Extensions for Dual-Process Language Agents

Cognitive Extensions for Dual-Process Language Agents: Memory and Self-Reflection in Interactive Environments

Why we picked it

This academic paper details the design and benchmark results of cognitive extensions for language agents, providing insights into improving long-horizon decision-making in interactive environments.

Researchers extended SwiftSage, a dual-process AI agent, with an Adaptive Memory Module (AMM) and a Self-Reflection Module (SRM).

Body

The full system, combining both extensions, achieved the best performance on ScienceWorld, with a mean final score of 64.

62, a success rate of 43.17%, and 19.

33 steps per successful action.The Self-Reflection Module was the strongest standalone contributor.

Original · arXiv cs.AI

Cognitive Extensions for Dual-Process Language Agents: Memory and Self-Reflection in Interactive Environments

Language agents remain brittle in interactive environments, where success requires long-horizon state tracking, valid action execution, and recovery from failed steps. We extend SwiftSage, a dual-process agent that combines a fast action proposer with a slower planner, using two modular cognitive extensions: an Adaptive Memory Module (AMM) for salience-gated episodic storage and trigger-driven retrieval, and a Self-Reflection Module (SRM) for bounded execution-time validation and corrective intervention. Both modules are implemented as feature-flagged extensions over the same execution substrate, enabling controlled ablations on ScienceWorld. Across four configurations---baseline, baseline+AMM, baseline+SRM, and the full system---the full system achieves the best mean final score (64.62), success rate (43.17%), and successful-step efficiency (19.33 steps), while SRM is the strongest standalone contributor. The results suggest that execution-time control is the dominant bottleneck in this setting, while episodic memory becomes most useful once the runtime loop is stabilized.

Industry Coordinates & Source Verification

This report is categorized under AITOP's "Models" desk, focusing on US frontier AI labs and Silicon Valley technology leaders. Within our cross-regional analytical framework, it directly maps to AI developer toolchains, coding agents, and engineering workflows and US-China foundation model benchmarks and commercialization comparison. Key entities and technical topics under continuous tracking include SwiftSage, language agents, AI research, cognitive extensions.

Source attribution: curated from arXiv cs.AI (@João Meneses dos Santos, Arlindo L. Oliveira).