Gary Marcus批评Noah Smith学术不诚实
Noah Smith (@noahopinion) has become deeply intellectually dishonest. If he actually followed the ...
Gary Marcus回应Noah Smith的批评,解释自己30年来的神经符号研究如何被AI发展所证实。
Gary Marcus指责Noah Smith在AI领域存在学术不诚实行为。Marcus强调自己30年职业生涯一直倡导神经符号混合方法,并指出数学领域的重大进步证实了这一观点。Marcus提到纯LLM与带有神经符号组件的LLM之间存在本质区别,以及数学领域的突破来自于神经网络添加神经符号组件。
Noah Smith (@noahopinion) has become deeply intellectually dishonest. If he actually followed the ...
Noah Smith ( @noahopinion ) has become deeply intellectually dishonest. If he actually followed the field he would a. understand the difference between pure LLMs and LLMs with neurosymbolic harnesses, code intepreters, verifiiers b. realize that a central point of my entire career, in work spanning 30 years, was advocating for neurosymbolic hybrids, (generally against great hostility from the field). c. realize that the great leap forward in math came from adding neurosymbolic components (harnesses and especially Lean) to neural networks. d. realize that that great leap forward in math actually *vindicated* my central claim. Instead he completely ignored all that to take a cheap shot, out of context. (Though I acknowledge I was off the timing of math.) —- *As Terence Tao has noted there are still lots of things that (some) world-class mathematicians can do, like invent new principles, and write clear proofs, that as far as I know AI has not done, though of the course the results are very impressive. Noah Smith 🐇🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼 @Noahpinion Gary Marcus could have been part of the AI revolution, but instead he dedicated the entire rest of his life to denying its existence in real time. Weird choice but ok 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 2 🔄 1 ❤️ 4 👀 318 📊 2 ⚡