Qwen 3.7-Max 在智能体任务中成本仅为 Claude 的1/9、GPT 的1/2，性能提升却翻倍，做 AI 智能体开发的团队值得关注这个性价比之选。
atomic.chat 团队测试了三个前沿模型在真实智能体任务中的表现：编写一个能自我训练并玩俄罗斯方块的机器人。每个模型可以读取自己的代码、运行基准测试并在10次迭代中自我重写。最终 Qwen 3.7-Max 以训练成本仅1.32美元、机器人性能提升56%的成绩全面领先，而 Claude Opus 4.7 成本12.15美元提升28%，GPT-5.5 成本2.85美元提升仅7%。Qwen 在成本效益和性能提升上均胜出，尤其在长智能体循环场景中表现出色。
👀👀
👀👀 atomic.chat @atomic_chat_hq Qwen 3.7-max beats Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 We tested three frontier models on a real agentic task: write a Tetris bot that plays the game and trains itself. Each model could read its own code, run benchmarks, and rewrite itself across 10 iterations. Then we compared the final bots head to head. Qwen 3.7-Max: training cost $1.32, bot improvement +56% Claude Opus 4.7: training cost $12.15, bot improvement +28% GPT-5.5: training cost $2.85, bot improvement +7% Qwen won on every dimension - biggest jump, 9× cheaper than Claude, 2× cheaper than GPT. Long agentic loops is where Qwen Max actually delivers. Your browser does not support the video tag. 🔗 View on Twitter 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 26 🔄 15 ❤️ 368 👀 15901 📊 48 ⚡