用户吐槽 ChatGPT 桌面端效率承诺未兑现，转向 Claude
一位重度用户把所有项目从 ChatGPT 桌面端搬到 Claude，还让 Claude 调度 OpenAI 模型。如果你也在纠结两家怎么选，这篇吐槽提供了用量限制和实际工作完成度的真实一手对比。
Kol Tregaskes 在 X 上发文称，OpenAI 每隔几个月就宣称 ChatGPT 桌面应用会带来效率改进，但改进始终没有落地，应用依然难用，模型本身也难以完成实际工作。他表示已将所有项目迁移到 Anthropic 的 Claude，由 Claude 管理调度 OpenAI 模型，并认为 Claude 的每周用量限制更宽松。
文中同时指出，ChatGPT 仍占据绝大多数市场份额，但他认为当前最强的 AI 实验室是 Anthropic。他呼吁 OpenAI 尽快按下"红色警报"按钮，并称自己希望各家实验室都能做好。
这属于一位重度用户对 ChatGPT 桌面端体验的公开批评，反映了部分用户在 Claude 与 OpenAI 之间的迁移趋势。
I agree here. Every couple of months they say the ChatGPT desktop app will get and has got efficiency improvements, but they never come. The app is still horrible to use, and the models themselves just don't get any work done.
I'm now having Claude manage the OpenAI models and I've moved all my projects over to Claude, which feels like it has more generous weekly usage.
We can't forget that ChatGPT has the vast majority of the market share, but in reality, the top AI lab right now is Anthropic.
I really want to see all labs and models do well, and for me particularly OpenAI. But if they haven't hit the red alert button yet, they desperately need to.
This report is categorized under AITOP's "Industry" desk, focusing on US frontier AI labs and Silicon Valley technology leaders. Within our cross-regional analytical framework, it directly maps to AI developer toolchains, coding agents, and engineering workflows. Key entities and technical topics under continuous tracking include Claude, ChatGPT, OpenAI, Anthropic.
Source attribution: curated from @koltregaskes (@koltregaskes).
