Ladybird 的决定戳中了开源社区在 AI 时代的核心痛点——代码责任归属问题，做开源维护或使用 AI 辅助开发的团队值得认真思考这一案例。
Ladybird 浏览器创始人 Andreas Kling 宣布项目将不再接受公开的 pull request，原因是 AI 生成的代码大量涌入，使得“提交代码即代表努力和善意”的假设不再成立。他强调，代码是否由手工编写已不重要，关键在于谁为进入浏览器的代码负责。这一决定旨在确保 Ladybird 成为面向真实用户的浏览器时，引入变更的人必须能承担后果。此举反映了开源项目在 AI 时代面临的信任与责任挑战。
Quoting Andreas Kling
We will no longer accept public pull requests. [...] A substantial patch used to imply substantial effort, and that effort was a reasonable proxy for good faith. That assumption no longer holds. [...] Whether code was typed by hand is beside the point. What matters is who is responsible for it once it enters the browser. Ladybird is becoming a browser for real users. The people introducing changes to it must be the people who decide those changes belong in the project, and who will answer for the consequences. — Andreas Kling , Changing How We Develop Ladybird Tags: ladybird , ai-ethics , open-source , generative-ai , ai , andreas-kling , llms