Jeremy Howard 的提议直击 AI 安全与权力分配的核心矛盾，关注 AI 伦理的从业者、政策制定者和开源社区成员值得一读，看完会重新思考“安全”与“开放”的平衡。
Jeremy Howard 在 Twitter 上提出一个解决 AI 递归自我改进速度问题的简单方案：排名最高的实验室必须同意不使用其顶级模型进行前沿 AI 研究，但其他所有人应能访问该模型。他认为这能阻止前沿推进，并避免危险的力量失衡。他批评 Anthropic 选择了相反的安全路径——允许自己（当前顶级实验室）使用顶级模型进行前沿研究，并破坏他人的尝试，这导致 AI 前沿推进且力量失衡加剧。Howard 明确表示自己并不主张放缓递归自我改进，而是主张尽可能开放和民主化。
Quoting Jeremy Howard
Easy solution to slow down recursive AI self improvement: The lab with the top-ranked model must agree THEY must not use it for working on frontier AI But everyone else should have access to it. By definition, this means the frontier doesn't advance. It also has the critical benefit of avoiding a dangerous power imbalance. Anthropic has chosen the opposite of the safe path: they are allowing themselves, the current top lab, to use their top model for frontier AI research. They've said they'll sabotage others who try. This means the AI frontier advances, & power imbalance increases. (To be clear, I don't think we should try to slow down recursive AI self improvement - I think we should open it up and democratize it as much as possible. My point is: if you claim we should slow down, and you have the best model, you should ensure your org can't use it.) — Jeremy Howard , in a Twitter thread Tags: ai-ethics , anthropic , generative-ai , claude-mythos , jeremy-howard , ai , llms