这项研究用游戏机制戳破了AI辅助创作中“默认接受”的假象，做创意工具或人机交互设计的团队值得一看，能帮你理解用户何时会主动拒绝AI建议。
该研究通过一个游戏化写作实验，探讨人类在AI辅助创作中何时会采纳AI建议，以及这对个人创造力的影响。74名参与者（214份回复）在写作时可以看到AI生成的单词建议，但游戏设定在一个反乌托邦未来，AI试图学习人类个性，因此明确禁止使用AI建议。实验通过反向设计“乐于助人的助手”模式，揭示用户真实偏好而非默认行为。分析聚焦于用户在不同任务类型中保持创意自主与违反规则接受AI帮助的行为模式。该游戏化方法为研究真实人机交互及效率与真实性之间的张力提供了新视角。
Nonslop: A Gamified Experiment in Human-AI Collaborative Writing
The rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) raises critical questions about human creativity and individual expression in an era of AI-assisted creation. When do humans adopt AI suggestions, and what are the implications for individual voice? This study examines these questions through a gamified writing exercise where 74 participants (214 responses) replied to prompts while AI-generated word suggestions were available as they wrote. The game simulates a dystopian future in which an AI is attempting to learn from what remains of human individuality, and disincentivizes AI-like writing. In doing so, it attempts to create conditions that reveal authentic user preferences rather than default behaviors, such as accepting a readily available AI-generated suggestion. Note that this is a deliberate inversion of the "helpful assistant" design pattern; the system is explicitly forbidding you from accepting AI suggestions. We analyze user behavior patterns across different task types, user behaviors, and response characteristics to understand the factors influencing human-AI interaction in creative tasks. The study focuses on when users choose to maintain creative autonomy versus violating the rules of the game and accepting AI assistance. It also explores how these choices relate to response patterns, task characteristics, and user behavior. This gamified approach offers both a framework for studying authentic human-AI interaction and a provocative lens for understanding the tension between efficiency and authenticity in AI-augmented creativity.