拿 GPT 三个模型在 Codeforces 上测修 bug,发现它们总爱大改甚至重写,对做 AI 编程工具的人挺有参考价值。
Latest
几个新模型在治理审查门上分数差距很大,完整路线跑通率最高也只有七成六,作者把为什么开源了,做流程自动化的可以看看。
OpenAI 把 GPT-6 Astra 的能力下放到 Sol 和 Luna 两个便宜模型,Luna 编码榜涨了 74 分,API 价格还砍了一半,跑批量任务可以看看。
Cline 里免费用 Gemini 3.8 Flash,1M 上下文加 291 tok/s,跑分还压过 GPT-5.6 Luna 和 DeepSeek v4.1 Flash,写代码可以直接试。
Xiaomi 新发的 MiMo-V2.6-Pro 在 AA 指数上拿到 46 分,只差 GPT-5.6 一分,成本却只要零头,权重还是 MIT 开源的。
OpenAI 拉了 80 多位心理医生做了个心理健康对话基准,GPT-6 Astra 考了 57.3 分,GPT-4o 只有 32.1,想看模型心理对话靠谱程度可以关注这套评测。
Rubric-augmented rewards trade raw benchmark score for trajectories a judge rates far higher, a hint that outcome-only RL over-optimises for narrow metrics while behavioural rubrics shape more genuinely skilled agents. Teams training terminal agents can reuse the open pipeline to convert existing Agent Skills corpora into RL environments instead of hand-crafting tasks. The US$90,000 generation cost also sets a concrete budget baseline for anyone planning similar corpus builds.
有人认真测了五个大模型能不能写阿拉伯古典韵散体 Maqama,连 GPT-5.4-mini 都在榜上,提示词策略的影响挺有意思。
OpenAI 新出的 GPT-6 Sol 和 Luna 便宜了一半,Sol 跑分还超过了 Claude Opus 5,做大批量任务可以认真看看这个定价。
The key finding is that skills can be internalized as model weights rather than injected at inference time, since the fine-tuned agent beats skill-assisted base models even without the skills provided. Agent engineers and fine-tuning practitioners can reuse the released environments and trajectories for SFT or RL with outcome-based rewards. The result also shows a 35B open Qwen-based model outscoring much larger closed models on SkillsBench, a useful cost comparison for teams building coding and tool-use agents.
OpenAI 用树莓派加 GPT-Live-1 和 GPT-5.6 Luna 搭了个能边聊边干活的桌面小设备,对话和后台任务分开跑,方案挺有意思。
客服公司 Ringg 把电话 Agent 换成 GPT-5.6,自动接了 65% 的来电,成本还比 GPT-4.1 便宜 90%,做客服自动化的可以看看。
OpenAI 新的 GPT-6 Sol 在真实用户投票的 Code Arena 拿了第4,价格只要 Claude Opus 5 的一半不到,做 Web 开发的可以看看分数再决定用哪个。
小米把 MiMo-V2.6 整套开源了,Pro 在智能体基准上打平 Claude Opus 5,本地跑前沿模型的门槛又降了。
Benchmark scores can hide whether a model survives long, multi-step builds, so the value here is watching Step 5 Preview handle mechanical synchronisation and real tooling rather than canned puzzles. Developers choosing between Step 5, GLM-5.3, Kimi K3 and Claude Opus 5 get a practical cost-versus-reliability comparison for agentic coding workflows. The stated price gap makes it a concrete candidate for teams in Southeast Asia and beyond cutting per-task inference spend.
这条汇总了几个小更新:Grok Build 的 MCP 返回结构化 JSON,Perplexity 能在 24GB 显存的电脑上本地跑,还有 Copilot 选模新档位。
OpenAI 把 GPT-6 Astra 的能力塞进了两个更快更便宜的模型,API 价格直接砍半,Genspark 上已经能用了。
一天之内 Opus 5.5、GPT-6 Sol/Luna、Grok 4.7、Mimo v2.6 全来了,Opus 5.5 还降了 40% 成本,这篇帮你梳理各家提升方向和 benchmark。
The key shift is replacing expensive persistent repository graphs and LLM-based exploration with a deterministic, feature-indexed retrieval pipeline, making repo-level context cheap enough for routine use. Teams building coding assistants or agent frameworks can adopt the approach to cut context costs without sacrificing dependency recall. For cost-sensitive deployments, pairing it with DeepSeek-V3.2 gives near-identical DIR@1 to GPT-5-mini at lower inference cost.
这篇讲了怎么把智能体跑长任务的 token 开销砍一半,方法只有一条:压缩只删不改,还开源了能在 Claude Code 里直接用的实现。
OpenAI 一口气发了 GPT-6 Sol 和 Luna 两款新模型,API 价格砍半,Sol 在基准测试里能跟 Claude 旗舰打平,性价比党可以直接上手试试。
一篇很实用的论文:不改模型、不改提示词,只在运行时注入失败 informed 的策略指令,GPT-5.6 跑 Terminal-Bench 的重复成功率就能涨近 10 个点,做 Agent 的可以看看。
The benchmark reframes agent evaluation around deliverable outcomes and payment-gated acceptance, a shift from metric-chasing benchmarks that miss corrupted training runs. Teams building or buying post-training-as-a-service can use the acceptance gate and corruption detector to screen automated fine-tuning pipelines. The human FDE baseline gives a concrete performance reference against all four frontier agents.
Anthropic 和 OpenAI 前后脚发新模型还互相砍价,GPT-6 Luna 只要 $0.10/M,做应用的成本又降一半,附完整价格对比表。
OpenAI 的 GPT-6 Sol 和 Luna 已经能在 Augment 的 Cosmos 里直接用了,他们还打算把整套 GPT-5.6 工作流迁过去,想看迁移实测数据的可以蹲一下。
OpenAI 把 GPT-6 Astra 的能力下放到了 Sol 和 Luna 这两个便宜一半的型号上,批量跑任务的可以看看价格。
GPT-6 两个新模型已经在 LMArena 可以测了,评分还没出,想抢先体验可以现在去投票。有人还拿它和 GPT-5.6 同条件跑了对比,token 用量和速度都测了。
OpenAI 把 Astra 的能力做成大中小三档,Sol 跑分超 Claude Opus 5 但成本只有 9%,跑长任务智能体的开发者账单能省不少。
OpenAI 把 GPT-6 Astra 的能力下放到了 Sol 和 Luna 两个便宜模型上,API 价格直接砍半,跑批量任务的成本党可以看看。
The same model can score differently depending on the harness around it, so benchmark numbers reflect the full stack rather than the model alone. Teams evaluating coding agents should rerun comparisons under their own harness before drawing conclusions. ReFigBench adds a new evaluation axis, and details are on arXiv (2609.18844) alongside a chat interface from dair.ai.
OpenAI 把 GPT-6 Astra 的能力塞进了 Sol 和 Luna 两个便宜版本,API 价格直接砍半,用 AI SDK 的开发者可以马上试试。
OpenAI 把 GPT-6 Astra 的能力下放到了 Sol 和 Luna 两个便宜一半的新模型上,还能在 Agent Arena 里亲手测试投票。
The benchmarks show where cheap small models can replace larger ones in RAG pipelines: stopping decisions and relationship filtering see large latency and cost savings with matched recall. Engineers building retrieval systems can use the published code to pick where to route between Jev, GPT-5-mini and Voyage rerank-3. The evaluation includes Chinese-language queries, useful for teams serving bilingual users.
The non-obvious angle is that DocJev combines small-model prediction with pluggable OCR backends, letting teams trade latency for accuracy per document type rather than defaulting to a heavy VLM pipeline. Developers building RAG ingestion or document-processing workflows can wire it into existing pipelines via the GitHub repo, with the default path fully free. Compared with gpt-5.6-luna, it targets teams where throughput on large document packets matters more than marginal accuracy gains.
OpenAI 又出新款了,GPT-6 Sol 和 Luna 是 Astra 的省钱版,API 价格直接比 GPT-5.6 便宜一半,跑批量任务的可以看看。
OpenAI 把 GPT-6 Astra 的能力塞进了更便宜更快的 Sol 和 Luna,缓存读取打 1 折,API 价格比 GPT-5.6 还低一半。
OpenAI 出了个便宜档的 GPT-6 Luna,跑分追平 Claude Opus 5,但只要零头的价格,看重成本的可以去 OpenRouter 试试。
OpenAI 新出的 GPT-6 Sol 和 Luna 上 OpenRouter 了,价格砍半,Sol 输入 2 美元、Luna 只要 0.1 美元每百万 token,跑分还比上一代强。
OpenAI 把 GPT-6 Astra 的能力塞进了 Sol 和 Luna 两个更便宜的型号,API 价格比 GPT-5.6 还砍了一半,跑批量任务的可以看看。
OpenAI 又发了两个便宜的模型,价格砍半,跑分还压过 Claude,写代码和跑智能体的成本能省不少。