想知道 GPT-5.6 哪里比 5.5 强、哪里反而弱？这篇实测用四个具体动画场景拆给你看，不吹不黑。
新测试对比了 GPT-5.6（Sol Ultra、Terra Ultra、Luna Max）和 GPT-5.5 xhigh 在 4 项 canvas 动画提示上的表现。在 macOS 'hello' 手写测试中，Sol Ultra 与 5.5 并列最佳。火球入水测试中，GPT-5.5 的蒸汽和气泡效果更真实。燃烧湿纸测试里，5.5 的火焰在水边停止、湿半页焦黑的表现更准确。ChatGPT 应用 UI 测试中，5.6 三大变体均正确遵循多步指令并逐字流式输出，而 5.5 跳过了流式。结论：5.6 在指令遵循和多步协调上明显更好，但原始物理直觉仍是 5.5 更强。
10、GPT-5.6 在一些意想不到的地方超过了 GPT-5.5 新测试揭示了它赢在哪里，也揭示了它还有哪些地方没赢。 https://t.co/e6rgG8Vu34
10、GPT-5.6 在一些意想不到的地方超过了 GPT-5.5 新测试揭示了它赢在哪里，也揭示了它还有哪些地方没赢。 x.com/stevibe/status… stevibe @stevibe 4 canvas animation prompts on GPT-5.6 (Sol Ultra, Terra Ultra, Luna Max) vs GPT-5.5 xhigh. The tests: ✍️ Mac "hello": Sol Ultra and 5.5 tied for the most authentic cursive. Luna Max wrote... something else. 🔥 Fireball into water: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra was strong, but honestly, GPT-5.5 did BETTER. The steam burst, the bubble plume. 📜 Burning wet paper: GPT-5.5 wins again. The flame stopped right at the water edge, smoke rose, and the wet half just charred black instead of burning. Realistic. 📱 ChatGPT app UI: this is where 5.6 pulled ahead. All three variants followed the multi-step sequence and streamed the reply word by word. 5.5 skipped the streaming. Takeaway: > 5.6 is clearly better at instruction-following and multi-step orchestration. > But raw physics intuition? The old model still holds its ground. Your browser does not support the video tag. 🔗 View on Twitter 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 2 🔄 0 ❤️ 1 👀 360 📊 2 ⚡