AI模型精选72°

网络安全基准测试:Kimi K3性价比突出,Sol能力跃升

Based on internal evals: ▪️ Kimi K3 is top-tier at cybersecurity There is chatter on X that Moonsho...

精选理由

Moonshot AI的Kimi K3在网络安全任务上性价比很高,比GPT 5.6便宜7倍但效果接近,适合做代码安全审计。

AI 摘要

Moonshot AI的Kimi K3在一项私有网络安全基准测试中表现顶级,召回/精度/价格比优秀。Sol模型安全能力大幅跃升,但成本是第二名的7倍以上。GPT 5.6召回和精度最佳,但价格最高。Fable 5完全拒绝执行任务,无法用于安全分析。建议用Sol做单次基线,Kimi K3做持续分析。

图片来源 · Guillermo Rauch
原文 · Guillermo Rauch

Based on internal evals: ▪️ Kimi K3 is top-tier at cybersecurity There is chatter on X that Moonsho...

Based on internal evals: ▪️ Kimi K3 is top-tier at cybersecurity There is chatter on X that Moonshot benchmark-overfit. These are stealth evals. Model has raw IQ. ▪️ Sol is a leap ahead in cyber capability At a significantly higher cost, but quite remarkable still. ▪️ Fable refuses everything We couldn’t get it to complete the run at all. What’s interesting is that Sol in comparison was much more open to helping with defensive cyber hardening TL;DR: frontier, open-weight cybersecurity capability is here. Try it on deepsec.sh for defensive purposes. Malte Ubl @cramforce We ran Kimi K3 on a private cybersecurity benchmark. TL;DR: Kimi K3 is the workhorse for cyber security tasks at great recall/precision/price. GPT 5.6 is best recall/precision but at 7x higher cost per run. For context, Deepsec.sh is an open-source cyber harness designed for finding vulnerabilities in large codebases. The eval runs deepsec on an undisclosed open-core application at a git sha before a large number of security issues were fixed. This is a secret eval that cannot be directly benchmark-maxxed. S-Tier: GPT 5.6 Sol: By far the most thorough analysis, but coming in at over 7x the price of the runner up. Best price/recall: Kimi K3. Next tier of recall at a good price Best price at good recall: GLM 5.2 (40% lower price than Kimi K3) GPT 5.5: Only recommended with subscription or high-discount API price. Similar recall to Kimi at much higher list price. Opus 4.8: Only recommended with subscription or high-discount API price. Similar recall to GLM 5.2 at much higher list price. Fable 5: 100% refusal rate. Cannot be used for security analysis. Sol on a large code base will quickly get into 6-figure pricing. This is still affordable relative to the risk of letting security issues unfixed or paying bug bounties. I'd recommend using Sol for a one-time baseline and then using Kimi K3 for continuous analysis. When using open-weight models, make sure to use an inference vendor that supports zero data retention. 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 12 🔄 7 ❤️ 84 👀 7539 📊 17 ⚡