这篇论文提出了BayesAME,能自动算出评估模型需要多少数据,比手动定大小更准更省事。
BayesAME是一种贝叶斯主动模型评估框架,能自动确定评估大型生成模型所需的核心子集大小。它通过定义潜在能力变量和联合先验分布来建模性能,利用信息增益准则迭代选择项目。在多个基准上的实验表明,BayesAME一致优于现有方法的顺序适应版本。研究还证实非随机核心子集选择优于随机选择,且使用连续响应对数似然能显著提升估计精度。
BayesAME: Bayesian Active Model Evaluation
Evaluating large generative models across benchmarks is time-consuming and computationally expensive. This drives the need for methods that can estimate full benchmark performance by evaluating models on only a subset of items, known as a coreset. Current literature mostly requires the practitioner to input a coreset size. However, when reliable performance estimation takes priority over efficiency, an evaluation method should also be capable of automatically determining a coreset size that reflects this priority. We introduce BayesAME, a sequential Bayesian framework specifically targeting automatic determination of the coreset size. BayesAME models performance as a random variable by defining a latent ability for each group of items sharing the same historical model performances, with a joint prior distribution encoding the belief that the target model behaves similarly to these historical models. The posterior distribution over these abilities is used to derive performance estimators, quantify performance uncertainty, and select items to add to the coreset via an information-gain criterion. The coreset is iteratively augmented until the performance estimate fluctuation and the performance uncertainty fall below their respective user-defined thresholds. We propose a multi-target extension that captures performance correlations across multiple target models to further reduce the coreset size. Through extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks, we demonstrate that BayesAME consistently outperforms sequential adaptations of existing methods. Crucially, our comprehensive analysis addresses recent skepticism in the literature, establishing that non-random coreset selection is advantageous over random selection. Finally, we highlight that leveraging continuous response log-likelihoods over traditional binary scores significantly enhances estimation accuracy.