行业83°

Box CEO Aaron Levie等a16z对谈:AI监管应在风险明确之后再谈

Box CEO Aaron Levie, Steven Sinofsky, and Martin Casado join Erik Torenberg to discuss "We Must Pace...

精选理由

Levie、Sinofsky、Casado三人聊AI监管,观点挺反直觉:智能体像DoS攻击、安全栈得重做,还有2028年AI选举的预测。

a16z播客中,Box CEO Aaron Levie、Steven Sinofsky 和 Martin Casado 讨论“我们必须为前沿设置节奏”这一议题。他们认为当前 AI 监管辩论的问题在于风险尚未定义就开始规制,而从计算机病毒到航空业的每一波技术,安全标准都是在了解技术实际失效方式后才建立的。播客指出智能体不知疲倦、运行规模巨大、会以员工不可能的方式进行系统探测,可能需要重新设计权限、认证和安全栈。他们还谈到 2028 年可能成为“AI 选举”,以及 AI 创新或更多发生在前沿实验室之外的模型周边软件中。

图片来源 · a16z
原文 · a16z

Box CEO Aaron Levie, Steven Sinofsky, and Martin Casado join Erik Torenberg to discuss "We Must Pace...

Box CEO Aaron Levie, Steven Sinofsky, and Martin Casado join Erik Torenberg to discuss "We Must Pace the Frontier," the upcoming AI election in 2028, and Jev: They argue that most of today's AI regulation debate is happening before anyone has defined the risks being regulated. Every prior wave, from computer viruses to aviation, built its safety standards after learning how the technology actually failed. Then it gets concrete. Agents don't get tired, run at enormous scale, and probe systems in ways employees never could, which may mean rethinking permissions, authentication, and the security stack itself. They close on why AI innovation may increasingly happen outside the frontier labs, in the software built around the models. 00:50 "We Must Pace the Frontier" 03:50 Do the labs believe their own x-risk talk? 06:49 If it's existential, nationalize it 11:32 "You're asking us to regulate you?" 12:08 2028 as the AI election 18:50 Tech never learned to navigate regulation 25:50 The law that came from one 1983 hack 28:39 Noam Brown's heat exfiltration idea 32:30 Cold War covert channel stories 34:35 Agent swarms look like a DoS attack 41:25 Sinofsky's fear: GDPR for AI 46:20 No jets if the FAA started in 1910 48:38 Jev: decision engines vs. chatbots 53:01 Labs build beings, software needs tools YouTube: youtu.be/TLJNJDf2XGo @levie @stevesi @martin_casado @eriktorenberg Your browser does not support the video tag. 🔗 View on Twitter 💬 8 🔄 3 ❤️ 17 👀 4932 📊 9 ⚡