GLM 搭配 8090 的 Software Factory 在代码迁移任务中成本砍到 1/16，虽然慢了点，但省钱效果很直观。
Vercel CEO 引用 8090.ai 的测试：在将 PHP 应用现代化为 Next.js 的任务中，Opus 4.8 搭配 Software Factory 比单独 Opus 4.8 便宜 1.4 倍、快 1.5 倍；换用 GLM 5.2 成本降低 16.4 倍，但速度慢 3 倍。测试为单样本方向性结果，后续将扩大样本量并对比美国开模型。
GLM is excellent at @nextjs. The evals validate it (https://t.co/SnZ54Xok7n), my own vibes validate ...
GLM is excellent at @nextjs . The evals validate it ( nextjs.org/evals ), my own vibes validate it, and @chamath ’s 8090.ai validates it Chamath Palihapitiya @chamath For those tracking the America closed source vs China open weight model debate: In an initial pilot on modernizing an application from PHP to Next.js, Opus 4.8 with 8090’s Software Factory was simultaneously 1.4× cheaper and 1.5× faster than Opus 4.8 alone. Pairing our Software Factory with the cheaper GLM 5.2 model cut costs 16.4×, though it ran 3× slower than Opus 4.8 alone. Results are directional (n=1 per arm), and next steps are to rerun with proper controls and 10–15 buyer-relevant legacy modernization tasks developed with our Sales and GTM teams. More to come but the important question it raises is why any American public company with shareholders burning money on closed source models when the open weight ones are so much cheaper? We will rerun this on American open source models next (aka Nvidia)… 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 2 🔄 1 ❤️ 58 👀 6328 📊 7 ⚡