ModelsSelected

Robbyant 开源触觉模型 LingBot-Touch,采用 Apache 2.0 协议

Why we picked it

做机器人或具身智能的可以关注,Robbyant 把触觉编码这条链路开源了,Apache 20 随便商用。技术上选 JEPA 而不是 MAE/VAE 的原因讲得很清楚,稀疏触觉数据的训练细节直接能抄作业。

Robbyant 发布开源触觉模型 LingBot-Touch,采用 Apache 2.0 协议,把机器人指尖传感器的原始读数转换成控制软件可用的信号,解决摄像头无法感知抓握力度和打滑的问题。模型包含三个同规模编码器,每个 5.46M 参数,用同一批触觉数据训练。

Body

训练 4,000 小时后,JEPA 版本在触觉到视频检索任务上取得 49.3% top-5 成绩,而 MAE 版本在 9% 以下,VAE 则跌到 3.1%。原因在于触觉数据高度稀疏且信噪比低:指尖只按压少数位置,大部分帧接近零值,重建式方法被迫复制无法预测的零和噪声,而 JEPA 只需在潜空间预测表征,可以跳过这些部分。掩码比例也从 40% 在前 300 步逐步升到 80%,目标由 EMA 编码器在四个深度产生,做法沿用 V-JEPA 2.1。

多源数据实验显示,固定目标传感器自身数据、只加入其他模态后,八个传感器-任务对中的七个获得提升,说明异构传感器数据能直接反哺单个传感器。

Original · rohanpaul_ai

Looks like a brilliant open source release for robotics.

A great problem of robotics is that a camera can’t tell a robot how hard it’s squeezing or whether a grip is slipping, but a fingertip sensor can.

Robbyant released LingBot-Touch, an open-source model (Apache 2.0) that gives robots a sense of touch by turning fingertip sensor readings into signals their control software can use.

Robbyant trained three same-size encoders (5.46M parameters each) on the same touch data for LingBot-Touch. At 4,000 hours, the JEPA version, which predicts the masked parts in latent space, got 49.3% top-5 on tactile→video retrieval. MAE stayed under 9%. The VAE got 3.1%, worse than it did at 1,000 hours.

I think the reason is the data itself. A finger only presses a few spots, so most of every frame is close to zero, and the readings that aren't zero are noisy. Redrawing that means copying zeros and noise nobody can predict, and a JEPA only predicts the representation, so it can leave both out. The paper names the sparsity and the low signal-to-noise ratio as the reasons they went with JEPA.

The sparsity shaped training too. With 80% of taxels masked from step one, a lot of clips had no contact left to see and the gradients blew up, so they ramp the mask from 40% to 80% over the first 300 steps. Targets come from an EMA encoder at four depths, following V-JEPA 2.1.

To isolate the effect of multi-source data, they hold each sensor's own data fixed and add only the other modalities. With the target sensor's data unchanged, the multi-source model improves on seven of the eight sensor-task pairs, indicating that data from heterogeneous sensors directly benefits each individual sensor.

Industry Coordinates & Source Verification

This report is categorized under AITOP's "Models" desk, focusing on China's AI industry and domestic foundation model ecosystem. Within our cross-regional analytical framework, it directly maps to AI developer toolchains, coding agents, and engineering workflows and US-China foundation model benchmarks and commercialization comparison. Key entities and technical topics under continuous tracking include LingBot-Touch, Robbyant, JEPA, 机器人.

Source attribution: curated from rohanpaul_ai (@rohanpaul_ai).