评论称某中国实验室有能力推 OpenAI 式编码订阅但选择不做
推特上关于 DeepSeek 为什么不出编码订阅的一条观点，角度是利润空间和现金储备，可以当八卦看看。
一条推特评论指出，这家实验室有足够利润空间推出类似 OpenAI 的编码订阅计划，且无需像 OpenAI 那样设置大量使用限制。
评论者认为其不这么做是出于原则，也因为现金充裕而无需靠订阅回收 GPU 成本。该内容为个人观点，非官方公告。
If they wanted to do a "coding plan" with OpenAI-style shit speeds and "crush open source!!" limits out the wazoo, they'd be able to do so. Plenty of slack in these margins. They don't do it on principle… and because they have more money than GPUs to buy.
This report is categorized under AITOP's "Industry" desk, focusing on China's AI industry and domestic foundation model ecosystem. Within our cross-regional analytical framework, it directly maps to US-China foundation model benchmarks and commercialization comparison and AI developer toolchains, coding agents, and engineering workflows. Key entities and technical topics under continuous tracking include DeepSeek, OpenAI, 编程助手, 订阅服务.
Source attribution: curated from Teortaxes (@teortaxesTex). Cross-source corroboration: 11 independent sources have covered this development (including The Information, @koltregaskes, Nathan Lambert), confirming industry-wide signal strength.
