Latest

Every published item, in order · 5280 items
Nov 10
How-toBuildersMulti-source18:41
Chinese content同一提示词实测:Claude Fable 5.2 比 Opus 5.5 贵 76% 但快 1 小时 15 分

有人拿同一句提示词实测了 Claude 两个模型做同一个“冰之教堂”场景:Fable 5.2 花 81.10 美元、不到 2 小时,Opus 5.5 花 45.97 美元、3 小时多。差价 76% 换来更快速度和更细的冰面、鲸鱼细节。正在纠结选哪个模型的开发者可以看看这笔账怎么算。

Event
AI Will@FinanceYF5Source
Chinese content当 AI 主导编码后,程序员的核心能力正在被蚕食

一位前端开发者的真心话:Vue 大升级和国际化改造全靠 AI 写码,他发现自己已经看不懂自己的项目了。不是劝你别用 AI,而是提醒你截图丢给 AI 之前,先想想调试能力还剩多少。写码的人看了会心里一紧。

掘金本周最热@石小石OrzSource
How-toBuildersSelected16:35
Mirobody Open-Source Tool Standardises Health Checkup Data for AI

The non-obvious point is that entity resolution at the data layer, not model capability, is the bottleneck for personal health analytics — Mirobody solves the unit-and-naming mismatch that makes LLM analyses of medical reports unreliable. Developers building health or quantified-self applications can self-host it locally under Apache-2.0 with no API key required for the mapping step. Anyone who has lab reports from different hospitals or countries, including the many cross-border professionals in Singapore and ASEAN, can use it to build a unified longitudinal health record before handing data to any model.

shao__meng@shao__mengSource
Chinese content彭博社 AI Coding 面试经历:不考 LeetCode 后,编程面试反而更难了

一个求职者刚面完彭博社的 AI 编程面试,考的是庞大的 Django 代码库,30 分钟内要边用 AI 边和面试官沟通,结果被拒。用一句提示词 one-shot 秒题也会被拒,因为面试官看的是协作过程。正在准备跳槽面试的工程师值得看看,新赛道的玩法和刷题完全不一样。

宝玉@doteySource
Chinese content像素游戏场景实测:国产模型观察力差距明显,交给 Opus 一小时完成

作者用 PixelLab MCP 做像素游戏场景,国产模型反复犯围栏错位、素材方向不对的低级视觉错误,handoff 给 Opus 后一小时就搞定了。做 AI 游戏开发或图像工作流的人应该看看,省钱和省时间怎么权衡这篇给了很具体的参考。

Viking@vikingmuteSource
Tomorrow 08:00, the daily lands in your inboxTelegram channel or email. Same screening as this page, no ads.
How-toBuildersOfficial15:08
Chinese content开源项目为国行 iPhone air 开启满血版 Apple Intelligence

国行 iPhone 用户可以看看这个,不用换机就能解锁被阉割的 Apple Intelligence。前提是要有美区 Apple 账号,系统得切成英文,还要下载 10GB 本地模型。作者是让 codex 帮忙搞定的,动手前先想清楚风险。

Event
Primary source歸藏(guizang.ai)@op7418Source
How-toBuildersMulti-source14:38
Chinese content用 Claude Fable 5.2 Medium 做三维机甲动画演示 Yonkers 地理位置

把查地图这件小事变成了一个小实验:让 Fable 5.2 Medium 写 Three.js,用 OpenStreetMap 数据做个机甲踩纽约的动画。想试 3D 生成或者找趣味学习地理的玩法可以照着抄这个提示词。

Event
Official accountSimon Willison’s WeblogSource
How-toBuildersMulti-sourceSelected14:32
Anthropic updates prompting guide for Fable 5.2

The non-obvious insight is that ownership framing in prompts measurably shifts how aggressively a model refactors code — a cheap fix before reaching for fine-tuning or scaffolding changes. Engineers maintaining automated refactoring pipelines and coding agents on Claude should test the phrasing against their own repos. The guide sits on Anthropic's public docs platform, so it is freely available to teams in Singapore and across ASEAN building on the Claude API without regional restrictions.

Event
Official accountSimon Willison@simonwSource
How-toBuildersMulti-source14:02
Chinese content提示词里一句话让 Claude Fable 5.2 主动重构代码

写提示词的人应该看看这个:Anthropic 官方文档实测,一句“代码库是你的”能让 Claude Fable 5.2 合并重复代码的比例从不到 10% 提到约 50%。维护老项目的开发者直接抄这句就行,比写一堆“请优化代码”管用。

Event
Official accountSimon Willison’s WeblogSource
How-toBuildersSelected13:23
Grok Bot vs ChatGPT: a product-atom analysis of agent design

The framework gives builders and product designers a vocabulary for comparing agent interfaces beyond feature lists: session, project and bot each shift where conversational continuity lives. Teams designing multi-agent products get a concrete design principle — Simon's near-decomposability — for splitting bot responsibilities. Practitioners choosing between ChatGPT, Grok and similar tools can use the atom lens to predict where their workflow context will accumulate before committing.

李继刚@lijigang_comSource
How-toBuildersMulti-source12:38
Chinese content当任务只需 5 行代码时,你的 subagent 会开始干什么

写代码时谁没见过 subagent 把 5 行的小事搞成大工程?这条视频吐槽的就是这个现象,评论区都在聊怎么控制 agent 的任务拆分粒度。如果你在用 Claude Code 或类似的多智能体工作流,看了会很有共鸣。

Event
Justine Moore@venturetwinsSource
Chinese contentBCG 调查:96% CMO 声称拥抱 AI,但少有智能体真正落地营销漏斗

BCG 调了 300 位 CMO,96% 说 AI 改变了营销,可真被问到智能体自己干了啥就没人接话。文章给出 DEFY 框架,教你判断营销漏斗里哪些环节值得交给智能体,哪些还该人来管。做市场投放和内容运营的人可以拿来对照自查。

e27@Aleks FarseevSource
How-toBuildersMulti-sourceSelected10:44
Anthropic guides developers on choosing between Claude Opus 5.5 and Fable 5.2

The counterintuitive finding is that effort level, not model choice, is often the cheaper lever — a low-then-high retry strategy beat always-high on both cost and accuracy in Anthropic's own benchmarks. Teams building with Claude Code or the API should adopt the start-with-Opus, downgrade-for-crated-tasks, upgrade-only-after-effort workflow and re-measure on their own workloads. Cost per completed task, not per token, is the metric that matters when budgeting agent pipelines.

Event
shao__meng@shao__mengSource
How-toBuildersSelected10:43
Airbnb fine-tuned Gemma4-E2B classifier matches frontier quality at 1% cost

The counterintuitive result is that longer prompts cannot close the quality gap once a task has a latency budget — task-specific fine-tuning beats prompt engineering for enforcement workloads. Teams running high-volume moderation, compliance or routing classifiers should treat sub-billion-parameter fine-tuned models as the default baseline rather than defaulting to APIs. The published break-even threshold (15–30 calls per minute) gives engineering teams a concrete decision rule for build-versus-buy, and the latency and cost methodology is directly reusable.

shao__meng@shao__mengSource
How-toBuildersMulti-source09:22
Chinese contentRiley Brown 演示用 Claude Opus 驱动 Blender 做 AI 视频后期工作流

Riley Brown 用 Claude Opus 加 Blender,一句提示词 10 分钟内做完了以前要 Screen Studio 加人工剪辑才能出的产品演示视频。和 Veo、Sora 那种直接生成画面不同,它是让模型操控剪辑软件做后期,结果可改可控。经常要做 App 演示视频的开发者可以照着搭一套。

Event
AI Will@FinanceYF5Source
How-toBuildersSelected08:42
Claude Code builds acoustic triangulation tool to locate mystery beep

Vibe-coding a one-off hardware-adjacent tool from a 2007 academic paper is a reusable pattern: the hard part is knowing the prior art exists, and an agent can handle the rest. Developers experimenting with Claude Code and sensor-style projects can borrow the validation loop — the clap test before trusting the output. The approach also demonstrates multi-device collaboration over a plain web server, no native apps needed.

Event
Official accountSimon Willison’s WeblogSource
Chinese contentWarp 的 Zach Lloyd 演示:智能体连续失败 37 次后主动提交 PR 修复自身工作流

Warp 的 Zach Lloyd 放出的演示挺有意思:智能体同一错误摔了 37 次,干脆自己提了个 PR 修工作流。做 Agent 的朋友可以看看这种"失败次数触发自我修复"的设计思路,他这周还会在旧金山 AIE CODE 现场讲。

AI Engineer@aiDotEngineerSource
How-toBuildersMulti-source05:22
Chinese contentAnthropic 的 Alex Albert 分享新模型发布后的提示词清理方法

Anthropic 的 Alex Albert 透露他每次换新模型就用这条提示词全项目体检,让模型自己找出过时的补丁指令。写Claude或Cursor提示词的人可以抄走直接用,几分钟扫一遍就知道哪些规则该删。

Event
宝玉@doteySource

Only the latest 2000 items are listed; for older ones see the daily archive