Papers

论文提出"机器他者"概念:用生成理论研究人与LLM的语言互动

Incorporating Machine-Others: An Enactive Exploration of Human-LLM Interactions

Why we picked it

一篇从哲学角度讨论人和LLM关系的论文,把LLM和宗教文本这类语言造物放在同一脉络里分析,角度挺少见的。

arXiv 论文《Incorporating Machine-Others》基于生成行动主义(enactivism)的 Linguistic Bodies 理论,分析人类与 LLM 的语言互动。作者认为传统技术影响理论与社会认知理论都无法解释 LLM 这种既无心智也无自主性的对话对象。论文提出人类以两种方式纳入机器他者:工具式的技能赋能,以及吸收 LLM 语言方式并影响身份认同。文中还引入"susceptive sense-making"概念,描述服务缺乏摩擦时人类承担的额外符号劳动。

Original · arXiv cs.AI

Incorporating Machine-Others: An Enactive Exploration of Human-LLM Interactions

New concepts based in interactional thinking are required to understand how humans are changed by relating to LLMs. Standard theories of technological impact upon users' autonomy are inadequate here, because this technology is capable of inducing linguistic interactions with humans in an unprecedented manner. Traditional theories of social cognition also fall short, because LLMs have neither autonomy nor minds nor sociality as such. And yet, humans interact, talk, and create with them. We base ourselves on enactive theory, particularly on the theory of Linguistic Bodies and recent developments of enactive accounts of AI, to explore how we make sense with machines. We argue that we incorporate machine-others in two ways: in the tool-like sense of incorporation as enabling particular skills, but also in the more linguistic and identity-tied sense of incorporating (and incarnating) LLMs' ways of languaging. However, LLMs are themselves excorporated and excarnated phantoms of our own languaging; we give a (machinic) body to our language. As such, we are not just incorporating machinic others; we are incorporating excorporated others. These conceptual advances draw a new map of our linguistic relation to LLMs, putting them in continuation with other forms of languaging involving other linguistic artifacts (e.g., religious books). We attend to some particular forms that this relation takes today, and how they may be impacting the autonomy and becoming of LLM-engaged humans. We introduce the idea of "susceptive sense-making" to characterize increased semiotic labour that is carried by the lack of friction that we sometimes encounter within these services.