别光看每token单价：DeepSeek V4-Flash跑同基准总成本比Fable低105倍，这条推文有数据。
omarsar0在推文中称，DeepSeek V4-Flash等模型的token效率被低估，建议更激进地尝试不同测试框架。他提醒，DeepSeek V4-Flash的每token价格虽便宜，但多轮交互可能使单任务总成本更高。@ArtificialAnlys报告称，DeepSeek完成与Fable相同的基准任务时，总成本仅为Fable的1/105。
I keep saying that the token efficiency on these models are underestimated. Be more ambitious with t...
I keep saying that the token efficiency on these models are underestimated. Be more ambitious with these models. Try different harnesses. Intelligence too cheap to meter is here! Cline @cline While DeepSeek V4-Flash is significantly cheaper on price per token, this can be misleading if the overall cost per task ends up being higher due to more turns being made. However, @ArtificialAnlys reports DeepSeek completing the same benchmark tasks as Fable at 105x lower cost. 🔗 View Quoted Tweet 💬 1 🔄 0 ❤️ 3 👀 1348 📊 1 ⚡