The metric shifts chip evaluation from peak compute to real serving capacity, which changes how buyers should read vendor spec sheets. Infrastructure planners, cloud capacity teams and analysts sizing inference fleets can use IPI scores to model how many concurrent users or agents a given GPU deployment actually supports. Compared with the H100, the GB300's 10× inferred advantage shows why last-generation hardware may be far more constrained for agent workloads than raw FLOP/s suggests.
#inference performance
Serving-stack software, not model changes, drove most of the speedup — a signal that inference infrastructure tuning is now as decisive as raw hardware for agentic workloads. Teams benchmarking DeepSeek deployments on GB300 or comparing against NVIDIA's Dynamo + vLLM reference setup can use AA-AgentPerf numbers as a realistic baseline for agentic coding performance.
CoreWeave 本季度要上 NVIDIA 的 Rubin NVL8 了,HBM4 能装下百万 token 上下文,跑智能体的吞吐是 B200 的 10 倍,做 Agent 服务可以盯一下。
The cost crossover at 6.8K tokens/s/chip reframes the Ascend-versus-Blackwell debate from raw benchmark losses to workload-dependent economics, suggesting DeepSeek could run its API on a sub-US$1B Blackwell cluster while pivoting post-training to Ascend. Practitioners tracking inference infrastructure or Huawei's CANN ecosystem get a rare concrete per-chip price and throughput comparison. The proposed 128-chip Ascend supernode topology has no Nvidia equivalent, which matters for anyone planning large-scale decode deployments.
华为用 DeepSeek 当参照秀自家算力:2 机柜就能训练,273K tok/s,不过序列长度和适用场景都有局限,看看具体数据。
The gap between a vendor's reported per-GPU throughput and an independent reproduction is a practical signal for anyone sizing inference deployments and budgeting GPU counts. Engineers benchmarking V4-Flash or similar open-source models can use this comparison to sanity-check vendor claims before committing hardware. The mention of TileLang kernels also points to where custom-kernel optimisation may matter most.
This benchmark demonstrates significant performance gains for agentic coding workloads, enabling more concurrent Devin sessions per GPU with lower costs. For developers and researchers working with AI coding assistants, these results suggest improved efficiency and reduced operational costs when deploying similar systems.
This tool democratizes performance testing for local AI deployments, enabling developers to make informed hardware decisions without relying solely on cloud benchmarks. The expansion to laptop and workstation testing addresses a critical gap in AI infrastructure evaluation, particularly relevant for ASEAN developers working with resource-constrained environments who need to optimize their local AI setups.
All optimization code is open-sourced, allowing ASEAN researchers and developers in biotech and drug discovery to directly apply the 4x speedup to their own GPU infrastructure.
For users interested in optimizing large language model inference on AMD hardware, this paper provides detailed engineering insights and performance benchmarks.
有人晒了 DeepSeek V4 Flash 在 DGX Station 上的实测数据,单机每秒能跑 1875 个 token,128k 上下文首字只要 5 秒,你可以拿这个数去衡量本地部署值不值。
Hermes agent看了条帖子就自动部署好DeepSeek v4 Flash,双DGX Sparks跑出82 tok/s,省人力还快。
想省电又怕买错GPU?WattGPU用公开数据就能预测新GPU和新LLM的功耗和速度,不用自己跑实验,误差才几个点。
这份 44 天的性能追踪数据对做 AI 推理部署的团队很有价值,能直观对比 NVIDIA、AMD 和华为硬件的实际表现,建议点开看具体趋势。
Fireworks AI 的演示直击 AI 落地的核心痛点——定制化和推理性能,做 AI 工程化的团队值得一看,能学到如何把模型从实验推到生产级规模。