有人发现 DeepSeek 这两个版本号可能其实是同一个模型,用 DeepSeek 的朋友可以看看自己的 API 版本对应关系。
Latest
DeepSeek 的 flash 模型指纹变了,疑似悄悄上了 V4.1-Flash-1017,有人说变聪明也更简洁了,可以自己试试对比。
有人实测了 Meta 新开源的 Muse Spark Open,结论是打不过 DeepSeek-v4.1-flash,还特能幻觉,想本地部署的先看看再决定。
Meta 放了个 816B 的开源权重模型 Muse Spark Open,美国开源第一,1M 上下文还能塞进两台 Mac Studio 自托管,不过跑智能体任务不如 GLM-5.3。
The takeaway is that attention architecture choice has become a strategic fork: American spinouts standardise on SWA while Chinese labs treat attention design as proprietary IP. Engineers evaluating open-weight models should look past parameter counts and check which attention variant a model uses, since it shapes cost and context behaviour. The comparison with Mistral's stack gives a concrete reference point for judging the trade-offs.
Hy Memory treats memory as three distinct types—chat events, ongoing work and code—so agents can resume long tasks with the right context instead of raw chat logs. The 39.3% token reduction also means lower inference costs for memory-heavy agent deployments. Developers building agents on LangChain-style stacks can compare it directly against Mem0 and MemOS, both of which it outperforms on the cited benchmarks.
OpenCode 里用 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 不扣套餐额度了,还有 200K 上下文,而 DeepSeek 官方 API 还得付费,写代码想白嫖的可以试试。
NVIDIA 新一代 Vera Rubin NVL72 的跑分出来了,跑 DeepSeek V4 Pro 每兆瓦吞吐量是上一代的 5.7 倍,还刷出 906 tok/s 的单用户最快速度。
把知识写进模型记忆到底行不行?这篇论文在 Qwen 和 DeepSeek 上做了实测,命中率数据挺扎眼,做记忆机制研究的值得看数据。
Meta 开源了 816B 的 Muse Spark Open,主打 1M 上下文和 Agent 任务,作者还算清了要跑起来得 700GB 显存,看看你的卡够不够。
小米 MiMo V2.6 Pro 超过 DeepSeek 登上 Agent Arena 开源第一,单任务才 $0.11,做智能体的可以看看这份榜单。
自己花几万块攒 v100 跑 DeepSeek V4.1 的人发现 Opencode 上直接免费用了,搞编程的可以白嫖试试。
Speed, not raw accuracy, is the headline here: a 55% reduction in total task time against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash suggests latency-sensitive agent pipelines are where this model fits best. Developers building Deep Agents workflows in Python can test it directly through ChatNVIDIA with open weights, making self-hosting or cost comparison against closed APIs straightforward.
用 OpenCode 写代码的可以白嫖 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 了,免费 200K 上下文,要 1M 才需要付费。
有人实测 DeepSeek 服务恢复后的新模型,速度 180 t/s,表现接近 Claude,可能是 4.1 Pro,想去试的可以看看。
Serving efficiency, not raw scale, is where V4.1 Flash wins: it delivers 1.3x to 6.2x the throughput per MW of V4 Pro 0813 across Blackwell hardware while scoring higher on intelligence. Teams running agentic coding workloads can use the AA-AgentPerf data to pick hardware — B300 nodes stay within about 20% of rack-scale GB300 NVL72, so single 8-GPU nodes are viable for this model. As an open-weights release from DeepSeek, it widens cheap self-hosting options for Southeast Asian inference providers competing with rented frontier APIs.
The MI355X's 288GB of HBM3E per GPU gives it an edge on very large models like the 1.6T-parameter DeepSeek V4 Pro, but serving-stack maturity on ROCm remains the bottleneck at higher loads. Teams evaluating accelerator purchases for agentic inference can now compare AMD and NVIDIA on realistic coding-agent workloads rather than synthetic throughput numbers. All results run on ROCm nightly builds of vLLM and SGLang, so scores should improve as the software stack matures.
The benchmark shows that outcome-only evaluation masks invalid execution, since models can hit the final goal while violating constraints mid-run — a gap that matters most in regulated domains like payments where intermediate errors carry financial or compliance consequences. Agent builders can use the 50-task suite and deterministic checks to measure constraint compliance and tool-call overhead, not just task success. Teams choosing models for workflow automation get a direct comparison of frontier and open models under identical conditions.
DeepSeek用V4.1 Flash做了个开源演示应用,在Together AI上能直接体验,感兴趣的朋友可以去试试。
这篇提出了一个挺聪明的思路:不再机械地问固定数量的问题,而是按报告缺口按需追问,作者还放了 429 条真实数据集和多个模型的对比成绩。
有人发现 DeepSeek V4.1 给自己打分挺高,给同样是自己扮演的子智能体打分却低不少,这个自评偏差挺有意思。
ARC Prize 实测了 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash,ARC-AGI-3 跑出 3.3%,成本不到 1000 美元,目前性价比最好的一份成绩单。
V4.1 和 Sol 6.1 这轮表现都很能打,尤其 Sol 6.1 出乎意料,还顺带聊了 Haiku 和 Fable 5.5 的定位。
Recraft 演示了一条三步头像工作流,从 V4.1 Pro 出图到 Seedance 2.5 成视频,提示词全公开,直接照抄就能跑一遍。
DeepSeek 这轮融资从 500 亿直接翻倍到 1000 亿元,估值却没涨,新进来的全是吉利、中芯聚源这种产业资本,还能顺带看看它科创板上市的筹备细节。
The benchmark penalises behaviours conventional evals ignore, such as oversized diffs, out-of-scope file edits and unhelpful tests, so its ranking offers a different picture of coding ability than SWE-style test suites. Even the best model fails over 40% of tasks, meaning maintainer cleanup is still unavoidable. Teams choosing models by cost-performance should note GPT-6.1 Sol matching Claude Fable 5.1 at under a tenth of the per-task price.
The benchmark's merge-focused grading penalises the messy diffs and unhelpful tests that cheaper evaluations ignore, so leaderboard gaps here reflect real maintainer acceptance rather than raw test-passing. Leading models still fail over 40% of tasks, and nine tasks went unsolved by every model evaluated. Teams choosing coding agents can weigh GPT-6.1 Sol's 49% score at US$0.81 per task against Claude Opus 5.5's 52% at far higher cost, with open-weights options like MiMo-V2.6-Pro at 45% close behind.
LMArena 给出实测数据:Kimi K3 和 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 用不到一成的成本追平了 Claude Fable 5,做 agent 选型前可以看看这份榜单。
有人实测 80 美元在 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 上跑了 3 万多次请求,比 Command Code 还多,写代码跑量的可以看看这笔账。
有人用 Codex 加 Deepseek-V4.1-Flash,让模型只写 JSON 就能自动生成会动的架构图,还能导出 GIF 和 MP4,画时序图、Sankey 图都行,做技术分享很实用。
This approach solves a critical bottleneck in long-context AI serving by enabling more efficient memory usage while maintaining high throughput. The technology allows models to handle significantly larger contexts without hitting memory limits, which directly impacts real-world applications requiring extensive context windows. Developers working with large language models should consider this optimization technique to improve performance in production environments.
Cost-aware routing in the agent harness, rather than a single frontier model everywhere, is becoming a practical default for coding agents. Teams building multi-step agents can benchmark cheaper models per task type and keep premium models for escalation only. The DeepSeek V4.1 Flash versus Opus split shows a concrete tiering pattern worth copying.
This benchmark result demonstrates the practical effectiveness of combining enterprise frameworks with specialized models for coding assistance. Developers working on complex software engineering tasks can leverage this combination as a verified reference point for building their own coding assistants. The performance compares favorably to other coding assistants in the market.
This price reduction makes long-context RL training and evaluation more accessible, potentially accelerating the development of specialized agent models. Developers building intelligent systems can now run more iterations with the same budget, while researchers can evaluate models on longer contexts without prohibitive costs.